Notice: Using Internet Explorer may cause some issues with loading dynamic content such as Cash Bids. Please use a modern browser such as Edge, Firefox, or Chrome.

CORN REPLANT DECISIONS
  • Corn replant decisions can be complex and must consider many factors.
  • Evaluate final population and stand uniformity.
  • Determine yield potential based on original planting date, final stand, and published tables.
  • Estimate the replant yield potential.
  • Factor in replant costs such as additional tillage, fuel, pesticides, labor, and seed.
  • Remember to comply with crop insurance requirements and pesticide label restrictions.

Corn replant decisions can be complex and must consider many different factors.  Modern production systems have multiple overlaid complexities, including stacked herbicide traits, insect defensive traits, in-furrow pesticides, supplemental seed treatments, and pre-emerge herbicides that can all factor into the replant decision.  Below are the primary steps for approaching the corn replant challenge.

1. Evaluate Final Population
Take a minimum of 5 stand counts per field to determine if enough plants remain.  Check stands in areas that differ in soil type, topography, and drainage.  It's possible that not all parts of the field will need to be replanted.  Check the roots of smaller plants for any injury to the primary root system or damage to the endosperm, as such injury may not allow for complete recovery.

2. Evaluate Stand Uniformity
Unevenness due to gaps in the stand can reduce yield.  Iowa State University guidelines suggest that recurrent gaps of 1 to 3 feet in length will reduce yield by 2%.  Recurrent gaps of 4 to 6 feet in length will reduce yield by 5%.  These reductions will occur even if the final plant population is adequate.  Unevenness due to delayed emergence can also reduce yield potential between 4% and 25%, depending upon the percent of plants emerging late and the number of days delayed (see Figure 1).

3. Determine Yield Potential
Refer to Table 1 to determine the percent of maximum yield potential for the original crop, based on planting date and final population.  For example, if the final population of the field is 25,000 plants per acre for a planting date of April 20, the field should have potential for 95% of maximum yield potential.  Suppose the field has recurrent gaps of 1 to 3 feet and 25% of the field was delayed in emergence by 10 days, we would subtract another 2% and 6%, respectively.  Now our estimated yield potential of the original stand is 87% of maximum.

4. Estimate the Replant Yield Potential
Continuing our example above, if the field can be replanted by May 15 and an optimum stand of 35,000 plants is achieved, the replant yield potential is also 87% of maximum.  Bear in mind that replanting is no guarantee of adequate stand the second time around.  In the case above, a farmer might be better off to take their odds with the first stand rather than accept the risks of replanting.

5. Additional Considerations
Assuming that a replant can happen timely enough to generate an acceptable level of yield potential versus the optimum, revenue gains from that additional yield need to be weighed against the added costs of replanting and any expected offset from crop insurance.  Costs to be considered include tillage, seed, fuel, pesticides, and labor.  Entire articles have been written on herbicide considerations in replant, but some of the key things to consider are reduced efficacy with previously applied herbicides, total applied active ingredient restrictions by label, and matching herbicide tolerance traits in the second hybrid against any previously applied products that may otherwise cause injury.  Fields with corn rootworm, wireworm or white grub pressure may require a second application of soil insecticide.   However, insecticides applied in-furrow and at planting have total active ingredient restrictions per growing season.  Whether additional pesticide can be applied will depend on the original application rate and the label restrictions.  Bottom line on any pesticide is to always read and follow label directions.  Later planting carries risk for delayed harvest and early frost, so replant hybrid selection may need to lean toward earlier maturities.  Later planting is also associated with increased disease and insect pressure, so replant hybrids may need to carry more aggressive defensive traits.  Additional costs can be expected for downstream fungicide and insecticide applications to combat these threats.

6. Replanting
If the decision is to replant, consider destroying the existing stand with tillage or herbicide, rather than inter-planting.  Planting into well-established corn plants is like planting into an existing stand of weeds.  The older, well-established corn plants will successfully compete for light, water, and nutrients.  Yield of the new stand that is planted into an existing stand of corn will likely be disappointing.  If areas to be replanted are somewhat small and scattered or localized over drainage patterns, inter-planting may be the only option to increase harvest stand but there also may be less yield loss associated with these small areas than you might think.     

Contact your FS Crop Specialist for your agronomic information.


Table1-Replanting-JPEG1.jpg

Figure1: Delayed Emergence Impact on Yield (Iowa State University)
Table 1: Impact of final population and planting on corn yield (Iowa State University)

References:
Estimating Yield and Dollar Returns from Corn Replanting (Nielsen, Purdue)
Uneven Stand Yield Loss Calculator (Iowa State University)
Replant Checklist (Iowa State University)

Related Articles

Aug 18, 2020

Even with the late start of the growing season, as of September 1, most corn acres across the territory are in the mid to late reproductive stages of development.

Jul 7, 2020

Silks emerge from kernels at the tip of the ear last and are least likely to be fertilized if the plant is under stress. Kernels at the tip may abort following fertilization if the plant becomes stressed during grain fill.

May 15, 2018

Making the corn replant decision can be complicated. Consider the following guidelines when making a replant decision.

Related Videos

Sep 8, 2021

Tips from the field with Matt Aberle.

Nov 17, 2019

Exciting new FS InVISION corn products in the 100 and 105 day maturity range.

Nov 5, 2019

Exciting new products int he 100 and 105 day maturity range from FS InVISION.

Your choice regarding cookies on this site:

We use cookies to optimize site functionality and give you the best possible experience.
Privacy Policy

Your choice regarding cookies on this site:

We use cookies to optimize site functionality and give you the best possible experience.